Do Teenagers or Elders Make the Safest Drivers

Picture the scene – you’re driving along on a busy road with a few different drivers which you can stick behind. There’s a gray haired guy pottering down the right hand lane and there’s a teenager driving swiftly along in the left. So which driver is the safest for you to follow?

Will you opt for the older driver with relatively poor vision, slower reflexes plus a pretty cautious style of driving or will you go with the youngster with much better eyesight and faster reflexes who is going along in the traffic flow?

There exists a very definite answer to this conundrum – stick with the existing gent.

Statistics show that the safest drivers are aged between 69 and 64 yrs old whereas teenagers (particularly boys) are the most dangerous of most drivers about the roads.

Man driving his car

The quantity of teenagers associated with car accidents is disproportionate to the number of teenage drivers in just about every country around the globe which is why fatalities (and insurance costs) are high.

Here’s a scary statistic for you – 60% of passenger deaths had teenage drivers between the ages of 19 and 16 and then for every mile they drive they are four times more likely to crash than older drivers.

Researchers looked at a period of time when teenager drivers accounted for 8.5 per cent in the total driving population in the usa although a lot more than 12 % of occupant deaths were from the same age range. This number included pickups, vans, cars and SUVs. From the same period drivers aged between 69 and 65 years accounted for 3.7 percent of the driving population but were linked to only 3.2 per cent of fatal road accidents.

So, exactly what are the main reasons that teenage drivers are the most dangerous on the road? Well, a few of them are pretty obvious actually:

• With a lack of experience – teenagers are less likely to distinguish potentially hazardous situations and more likely to underestimate potentially dangerous situations.


• Poor judgment calls – teenagers have a tendency to drive faster than older drivers rather than allow enough stopping distance between themselves and other vehicles.

• Lower use of seat belts – teenagers don’t use their seat belts as religiously as older drivers, regardless of what they might inform you. In 2007 more than 60% of passenger vehicle occupants in the age range 15 – 20 who were killed in road traffic accidents were not wearing their seat belts.


Those really are some scary statistics don’t you imagine – for both parents of teenagers who have just got their licenses and for all the other road users who have to share with you driving space with them.

Perhaps it’s all down to experience but older drivers have a tendency to know their limits and drive within them. Teenagers continue to be searching for their limits and so are more easily distracted by what’s, music and friends occurring around them. To put it plainly – their ability nowhere near matches their self confidence behind the wheel.

So, now you know. Next, time you receive stuck in traffic behind an elderly person who is pottering along at well below the speed limit don’t let it bother you, just relax safe in the knowledge that they are much less probably going to be involved in an accident that the youngsters who just went screaming by on the lights.

Check out and you’ll see that they’ve got some superb motors available, in fact why not drive down to dodge garden grove and see for yourself. Beware of the drivers near you on the roads.

What’s Going On With England Roads

Motorway stock

Around half of the white line road markings on major highways in England need replacing as soon as possible.

This is the conclusion from a study of 2,500 miles of the country’s roads by the Road Safety Markings Association (RSMA).

It found that 52% of markings on motorways, 42% on dual carriageways and 48% on single carriageways need replacing immediately or scheduling for replacement right away.

Just 16% of markings on motorways were deemed to remain excellent condition, while only 13% of those on single carriageways fell in to the same category.

Not up to the required standard

George Lee, RSMA national director, described it as shameful that a lot of road markings in England fail to meet the required standard.

Despite continuing to give assurances of their commitment to road safety, those accountable for the upkeep of our roads continue to neglect the most cost-effective safety device available to road engineers, the white line, he said.

These markings happen to be paid for because we, as taxpayers, are paying to get the roads maintained properly, including the markings, and this is just not happening.

The robust evidence in our survey and in this report proves this to be the case.

94% of markings on M3 stretch need replacing

A stretch of the M3 between Bagshot and Camberley in Surrey scored the lowest rating in the country.

As many as 94% of markings were found to be in demand for replacing or being scheduled for replacement.

The A34 from the junction of the A44 (Kidlington) and also the M40 (Bicester) in Oxfordshire, on the other hand, scored the highest rating.

No markings were found to be in demand for replacing, with 99% in excellent condition.